Miho Kuramochi vs Lizette Cabrera Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Apr at 05:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Kuramochi vs L. Cabrera

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kuramochi 2 - 0 Cabrera
They have played 5 sets in total, with Miho Kuramochi winning 4 and Lizette Cabrera winning 1. The last match between Miho Kuramochi and Lizette Cabrera was at the W35 Osaka, 10-04-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Miho Kuramochi getting the victory 3-6 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kuramochi | 2 |
| Cabrera | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Osaka(04-10-25)
(R1) W75 Burnie(01-30-24)
M. Kuramochi vs L. Cabrera H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,200 | Career Prize Money | $395,879 |
| 60.00% (159-106) | Career Total W/L | 53.71% (304-262) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 10 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Kuramochi vs L. Cabrera Match Preview:
When assessing the upcoming tennis match between Cabrera and Kuramochi using recent performance data, both players display notable skills and show comparably consistent stats over key aspects of their game. In recent months, Cabrera has demonstrated marginally superior performance on second serve points, securing 37.86% compared to Kuramochi's 37.74%. This slight edge in handling second serves might influence match outcomes, as historical data suggests a strong correlation between second serve performance and match predictions.
An examination of return game statistics reveals more nuanced distinctions. Cabrera's return game strength is clearly evidenced as she has won 54.14% of her opponent's second serve points, barely outpacing Kuramochi, who has attained a close 53.91%. However, it's Kuramochi who shines brighter against first serves, crushing 37.68% compared to Cabrera's 33.23%. Such return capabilities weigh heavily in determining the likely winner in their head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, both athletes exhibit resilience. Kuramochi proves slightly more adept at saving breakpoints, with a 46.75% success rate, compared to Cabrera's 45.99%. This ability is critical during high-stakes moments in matches, providing insights for live betting predictions.
From a broader performance perspective, Cabrera has been more successful overall in the past year, with a win rate of 65%, in contrast to Kuramochi's 54.93%. Despite Cabrera's higher win percentage, head-to-head statistics favor Kuramochi, who secured their only clash, winning in straight sets 6-3 6-0 at W 75 Burnie on a hard court. Cabrera's lack of victories against Kuramochi in their sole encounter casts an important contextual shadow over current form.
The players' preferred surfaces add another layer to the prediction puzzle. Cabrera excels on grass with a 58% win rate but struggles on clay, while Kuramochi boasts an impressive 66% winning rate on clay, despite weaker showings on indoor hard courts. Analyzing these surface preferences is essential when forecasting match outcomes, especially given their stark contrast in surface performance.
Evaluating the calibre of their opponents, it emerges that Kuramochi has faced generally tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 268.85, compared to Cabrera's 365.19. Such metrics indicate Kuramochi's capacity to maintain competitiveness against higher-ranked adversaries.
Evaluating match predictions through the lens of breakpoint conversion rates, Cabrera, with notable efficiency, holds a conversion rate of 47.41% against Kuramochi's 44.39%. This difference can provide critical opportunities during crucial junctures within tight matches.
Conclusively, weighing all analyzed statistical facets including prior encounters, surface comfort, competitive consistency, and pressure management, Kuramochi emerges as slightly more likely to secure victory, contingent on replicating past performance and leveraging her edge in return games. However, Cabrera's potential to counteract this projection cannot be ignored. The ultimate outcome will indeed depend on the dynamic interplay of these statistically analyzed variables during the match itself.
Miho Kuramochi vs Lizette Cabrera Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Kuramochi vs L. Cabrera H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 18 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:0:1 | Average Match Time | 2:0:1 |
| 82% (133/162) | 1st Serve % | 70% (108/155) |
| 58% (77/133) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (61/108) |
| 55% (16/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (16/47) |
| 48% (12/25) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (6/18) |
| 50% (78/155) | Return Points Win % | 43% (69/162) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Kuramochi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
L. Cabrera Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 0-6 6-3 7-5 | ||

M. Kuramochi vs L. Cabrera Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.00% (159/106) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.71% (304/262) |
| 59.73% (359/242) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.52% (698/631) |
| 54.72% (2889/2391) | Games Win/Loss | 51.28% (6308/5992) |
| 58.33% (112/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.84% (221/182) |
| 65.52% (19/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.98% (23/36) |
| 64.10% (25/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 58.33% (42/30) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 79 | Aces Total | 837 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 728 | Total Double Faults | 1779 |
| 1:36:26 | Average Match Time | 1:21:11 |
| 247.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.53 |
| 73% (11050/15230) | 1st Serve % | 64% (21309/33273) |
| 58% (6384/11050) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (12703/21309) |
| 43% (1814/4180) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5284/11964) |
| 51% (1081/2121) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2098/4406) |
| 49% (7466/15304) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15658/33401) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 32.43% (12/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 39.19% (29/45) |
| 55.70% (88/70) | Challenger W/L | 59.29% (249/171) |
| 67.31% (70/34) | Futures W/L | 44.44% (12/15) |
| 61% (158/259) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (299/560) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 48% (20/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (65/128) |
| 47% (34/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (106/199) |
| 88% (160/141) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (293/245) |
| 11% (160/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (293/48) |
| 18% (105/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (273/59) |